<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Beyondpuke &#187; mediacrat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://beyondpuke.com/blog/tag/mediacrat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://beyondpuke.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:25:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Print Media is dying, Network TV not far behind..Why</title>
		<link>http://beyondpuke.com/blog/2009/01/30/print-media-is-dying-network-tv-not-far-behindwhy/</link>
		<comments>http://beyondpuke.com/blog/2009/01/30/print-media-is-dying-network-tv-not-far-behindwhy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 03:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tony</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perspective]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mediacrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mediacrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mediaocracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[socialism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beyondpuke.com/?p=90</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Print media forgot the repsonsibility to their readers. Greed, laziness, created that which resembled a carrier for advertising.  Embedded in the text of stories with little relevancy, or simply reprinted from wire services, that took their stories from other reprints soon left all of us wondering where the value was to newspapers. Broadcast meda, traditional [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Print media forgot the repsonsibility to their readers. Greed, laziness, created that which resembled a carrier for advertising.  Embedded in the text of stories with little relevancy, or simply reprinted from wire services, that took their stories from other reprints soon left all of us wondering where the value was to newspapers.</p>
<p>Broadcast meda, traditional and cable are finding the same sloth, greed, by looking more and more alike, most of what is alike is so far to the left politically, unlike the center of America.  Reality shows of every type, run by real talented wasted that one who might choose engineering or some other profession. Their is such a wealth of talent from those on the left. I fear that those willing to do the work that makes a civilization work in the past now all want to be an artist of some sort.  Anything that brings fame, that is easy, and fun.  The web is sneaking up, I haven&#8217;t heard it spoken of late or at all.  Think about it.  When I sit down watching TV, totally fed up that their is more and more repeated news you can&#8217;t use, and more repeated crap, you churn the channels and if it was easy and if the Web was incorporated into the TV and the TV is the WEB and the WEB is TV, or shall I say, TV is DEAD at this point.  Thus&#8230;check this out, ..</p>
<p>Two things happen,&#8230;Obama and any thoughts about controlling the media won&#8217;t happen if all the broadcast everything goes to web..that will take care of that one now won&#8217;t it. Meanwhile, the TV statlions dye, the Web is not far from this happening.  It is already happening to some degree.  I&#8217;m sure it wouldn&#8217;t</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://beyondpuke.com/blog/2009/01/30/print-media-is-dying-network-tv-not-far-behindwhy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

